The Good Food Institute [GFI] has waded into the row over whether plant-milks should be labeled 'imitation' milk.
The GFI is an independent, non-profit devoted to creating a healthy, humane, and sustainable food supply. According to a blog post by the organization: "The dairy industry believes that soy and almond milk makers should be censored from calling their products what they are, soymilk and almond milk."
The dairy industry has claimed that calling non-dairy products - like almond milk - milk, can 'confuse consumers'.
Last year the GFI filed a petition with the Food and Drug Administration [FDA], asking manufacturers to allow the use of standardized dairy terms such as 'milk', 'cheese', and 'yogurt' across vegan products.
But the National Milk Producers Federation [NMPF] urged the FDA to reject the petition - saying the request clashes with established laws and is inconsistent with FDA regulations - which state that 'milk' must come from an animal.
In addition, the NMPF's CEO Jim Mulhern said the request 'flies in the face of established law and common sense'.
Writing in the 20-page comment section on the petition, he said: "Nothing has happened in the last 20 years that makes it OK to combine plant or nut powders with water, sugar, emulsifiers, stabilizers, and other chemicals, and call it 'milk'.
"This request is wrong on its merits and is designed to further mislead consumers."
But when the dairy industry took its case to federal court last year, Judge Stephen V. Wilson said 'no reasonable consumer could be misled' by almond milk labels.
He added: "Even the least sophisticated consumer would know instantly the type of product they are purchasing."
According to the GFI: "But plaintiffs' lawyers are back with the same tired trope, begging the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to smack down the industry’s ridiculous arguments yet again, in Painter v. Blue Diamond.
"GFI lawyers have weighed in to defend the free speech of plant-based companies."
GFI's Attorney, Nigel Barrella, added: "The dairy industry’s argument is not just an absurd distortion of the law, but it also would violate the First Amendment.
"Food producers have free speech rights too, and the Government cannot force them to use vague and derogatory names like 'imitation milk'."
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are prepared in the author's capacity and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Plant Based News itself.Reuse this content
Maria is the Editor of Plant Based News. A former magazine editor, newspaper reporter, and features writer, her work has been published by The Guardian, The Huffington Post, and various regional newspapers. She was previously the editor of Vegan Life magazine and Vegan Trade Journal. She has interviewed a huge range of people, from Prime Ministers to authors, activists, pop stars and actors, and enjoys the varied range of topics writing for PBN allows her to tackle. You can follow her on Twitter @MariaChiorando and Instagram @mariachiorando.
Since you're here...
Plant Based News is a FREE service that receives millions of views each week on Youtube, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, our weekly newsletter and this website. This takes a lot of our personal time, money and hard work. But we do it because we KNOW it makes a difference. If those following our reporting helped by contributing, we could do even more. Please consider supporting us so we can create further awareness about animal rights, environmentalism, ethical consumerism and the plant-based lifestyle. Not a false narrative - but information that empowers people to make better choices.