Natalie Portman's film Eating Animals has gone on general release across the US today.
The movie, which is voiced and produced by Portman, is based on Jonathan Safran Foer's book of the same name. The writer - along with Christopher Dillon Quinn, who also directs - co-produces.
It has been described as telling 'the story of the beginning of the end of factory farming' by the production team, as it starts with the question 'where do our eggs, dairy and meat come from?'
According to a number of sources, the film makes an argument against factory farming, featuring footage from both intensive facilities and smaller 'family-run' businesses.
Co-producer Foer described the approach to the film as being 'open' to different viewpoints, telling Vanity Fair: "We would talk about, what is the tone that will make this very difficult subject approachable?
"Because people are so disinclined to approach it, to willingly say, 'I'm going to upset myself for 90 minutes. You're gonna tell me this thing I love, it's probably not good for me or anybody else.
"It's counterproductive to be holier than thou."
A clip from Eating Animals
According to Variety, this approach translates into showcasing small scale livestock farmers as 'the most compelling figures in the film...who have sidestepped the industrial-farming system to raise their own meticulously cared-for chickens, turkeys, and hogs'.
It adds: "Eating Animals understands the boutique economics of what it's showing us. It knows that heritage farms like these represent just one percent of the farmers in America, an elite group who have subverted the system and are keeping an old idea of farming alive.
"The other 99 percent have been sucked into the exhausting competitive juggernaut of factory farming, in which farms raise animals on a scale of mass production, which requires conditions that are called, euphemistically, 'confinement agriculture' but might more accurately be described as an animal holocaust."
One vegan who saw a preview of the screening revealed to Plant Based News that they were disappointed by the movie.
They said: "It feels like a missed opportunity. There is only one way to end the horror of animal exploitation - and that is to go vegan.
"The way I interpreted it, this film was suggesting that eating animals from higher welfare farms was a really positive step fowards - but as we know even animals from more 'humane' farms are slaughtered to satisfy human appetites.
"It would be impossible to feed the planet on animals reared in the better conditions on some of the farms shown. A stronger message would have been to avoid animal exploitation entirely."
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are prepared in the author's capacity and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Plant Based News itself.Reuse this content
Maria is the Editor of Plant Based News. A former magazine editor, newspaper reporter, and features writer, her work has been published by The Guardian, The Huffington Post, and various regional newspapers, as well as Vegan Life magazine and Vegan Trade Journal. She has interviewed a huge range of people, from Prime Ministers to authors, activists, pop stars and actors, and enjoys the varied range of topics writing for PBN allows her to tackle. You can follow her on Twitter @MariaChiorando and Instagram @mariachiorando.
Since you're here...
Plant Based News is a FREE service that receives millions of views each week on Youtube, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, our weekly newsletter and this website. This takes a lot of our personal time, money and hard work. But we do it because we KNOW it makes a difference. If those following our reporting helped by contributing, we could do even more. Please consider supporting us so we can create further awareness about animal rights, environmentalism, ethical consumerism and the plant-based lifestyle. Not a false narrative - but information that empowers people to make better choices.