Making fruit and vegetables cheaper by subsiding them could save more than 150,000 American lives by 2030, according to a new study.
The research, published in PLOS Medicine medical journal, also compared the potential impact of subsidising fruit and veg against putting a levy on fizzy drinks.
The report's authors said: "Large socio-economic disparities exist in US dietary habits and cardiovascular disease mortality. While economic incentives have demonstrated success in improving dietary choices, the quantitative impact of different dietary policies on cardiovascular disease mortality disparities is not well established.
"We aimed to quantify and compare the potential effects on total cardiovascular disease mortality mortality and disparities of specific dietary policies to increase fruit and vegetable consumption and reduce sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption in the US."
In order to calculate the impact of subsidizing these healthy foods - compared to putting a levy on fizzy drinks - Scientists used the US IMPACT Food Policy Model.
Their findings suggest that subsidies are more effective than taxes, with stats showing that a subsidy on produce could increase fruit and vegetable consumption by 14 per cent, but a 10 per cent price increase on soda would only reduce consumption by seven percent.
They also discovered that a 10 per cent produce subsidy was a staggering five times more effective at preventing or postponing death by 2030 than the drinks levy.
The report's authors concluded that using both these strategies would be the most effective way to reduce the mortality rate from heart disease, saying: "Fiscal strategies targeting diet might substantially help to reduce the unequal cardiovascular disease mortality burden in the US.
"[Both] dietary policies could be effective, whilst a combination of national and targeted policies might be even more powerful in reducing both cardiovascular disease mortality and socio-economic disparities."
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are prepared in the author's capacity and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Plant Based News itself.Reuse this content
Some of our articles are published as a team, which means the article has been produced by a collection of people rather than one author. If you have any questions regarding what is written above please contact us.
Since you're here...
Plant Based News is a FREE service that receives millions of views each week on Youtube, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, our weekly newsletter and this website. This takes a lot of our personal time, money and hard work. But we do it because we KNOW it makes a difference. If those following our reporting helped by contributing, we could do even more. Please consider supporting us so we can create further awareness about animal rights, environmentalism, ethical consumerism and the plant-based lifestyle. Not a false narrative - but information that empowers people to make better choices.