Dog Mutilation Case Dismissed Due To Legislation ‘Loophole’

A local animal welfare charity was 'concerned' by the case
Publish date:
'Tail docking' is usually performed for cosmetic reasons 

'Tail docking' is usually performed for cosmetic reasons 

A Canadian dog breeder has been found 'not guilty' of a practice called 'tail docking' in a case an animal welfare charity described as 'very disappointing'.

Debbie Baggs, 44, from Nova Scotia, was charged was charged by the NS SPCA for causing distress to puppies after she placed rubber bands on their tails until they lost circulation and eventually fell off.

'Generally accepted practice'

'Tail docking' is no longer practiced by veterinarians in the province. 

The 'procedure' -
usually only performed for cosmetic reasons - was banned in 2010 by the Nova
Scotia Veterinary Medical Association.

But despite the
consensus among veterinarians, the judge argued that tail docking could be
categorized as a 'generally accepted practice in animal management'.

Local veterinarians officially stopped 'tail docking' in 2010

Local veterinarians officially stopped 'tail docking' in 2010


under the terms of the existing legislation, the charges against the defendant
were dropped.

Section 21 of the province's Animal Protection Act explicitly states that 'no
person shall cause an animal to be in distress', one subsection states that
this 'does not apply if the procedure is carried on in the accordance with
reasonable and generally accepted practices of animal management, husbandry or
slaughter or an activity exempted by the regulations'.

SPCA 'concerned'

Since Baggs was acquitted, the Nova
Scotia SPCA has called the province’s Animal Protection Act into question.

Jo-Anne Lansburg, Chief Provincial Inspector of the organization, expressed concerns that more pet owners will attempt 'tail docking' at home, and is lobbying for change in the legislation.

She said: "I’m confident that the minister of agriculture will see this for the loophole it is and make the appropriate changes in the legislation to prevent this from happening in the future."